Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:44

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What drivers said at Michigan after Cup race won by Denny Hamlin - NBC Sports
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
How to Make AI Faster and Smarter—With a Little Help from Physics - WIRED
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is the best TV to consider from an interior design perspective?
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How long does it typically take for prices to return to normal after tariffs are removed?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Scientists Discover 'Goblin Prince' That Roamed With Dinosaurs - sciencealert.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Walk your way to a sharper mind: How 40 minutes of walking boosts brain size - Times of India
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.